Why South Asian television defeats most international providers
The failure is structural rather than lazy. India has 22 official languages and eight of them support full television ecosystems — general entertainment, news, film and music channels in each. Building a credible South Asian line-up therefore means building eight parallel line-ups, each requiring its own guide data, its own metadata and its own understanding of which channels matter. Compare that with the United Kingdom, where one language and roughly forty channels that anyone actually watches will get you most of the way. The cost-per-subscriber of doing South Asia properly is several times higher, so most providers do not, and instead carry a Hindi bouquet labelled India.
For a Hindi-speaking household that is adequate. For everyone else it is close to useless, and it is why Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam and Bengali households so often end up paying for a specialist diaspora package with an equipment rental and a contract attached. Our approach is to treat each language as its own market with its own group depth, and to accept that this costs more to maintain. The alternative is a channel count that looks impressive and does not contain the four channels a given family actually wanted.
